My Photo

Pages

« levitation | Main | Mint.com adds real estate tracking »

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Comments

kimbailey

Hello, i am kimbailey.
So I agree They will either have to reduce the size of their funds or to increase the number of investments in your site.

------------------

kimbailey

real estate

Chris Yeh

Bottom line, VCs need to understand that their job is to create value based on market realities. When big exits aren't there, big funds are irresponsible.

Collecting the management fees on an excessively large fund provides short-term income, but is a losing long-term strategy.

Julien

I agree, and we should go further. Untill know, VCs used to have between 20m and 100m under management for each fund. They will either have to reduce the size of their funds or to increase the number of investments. Reducing the size of the funds means they will have to decrease their fees and carried interested, so they will not do it! So I think they will know have to increase significantly the number of investments they will make.

Basically, the VC marlket size is the product of "number of VC investments" by "average VC funding". If you reduce one, you have to increase the other one!

So what entrepreneurs will "lose" with lower valuation, they will "earn" it with higher probabilities of getting funded!

What do you think Dave?

The comments to this entry are closed.