My Photo

May 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Where I'm At:


What I'm Up To:


Recent Comments

Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 11/2004

« Startup Metrics for Pirates @ SXSW 2008 | Main | The CrunchDream 5: Who is Mike Arrington's Charles Barkley? »

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

Web Mail Services Market Share (Comscore, Oct 2007)


  Web Email Market (Comscore, Oct07) 
  Originally uploaded by davemc500hats

This is an interesting graphic / stat from Comscore (from Oct 07).  Note that it doesn't reference the recent growth of email on social networking services like Facebook & MySpace, but still it's revealing.

Email is still a very rich (and often overlooked) source of social networking / social graph data, as is IM and SMS data as well.  This is notable if only because 2 of the largest stores of this data are Yahoo & AOL, both of whom are arguably up for grabs / in play.

Also noteworthy: i didn't realize Gmail had made such gains in the space.  I had assumed they were #4 behind Yahoo / MSFT / AOL, but either AOL hasn't kept up with market growth, or Gmail has substantially outperformed in acquiring users since its launch a few years back.  (perhaps a bit of both).

anyway, there's more juice here for an upcoming post i'm writing about monetizing social networks, but needless to say i think i'm not alone in suggesting PEOPLE ARE UNDERVALUING EMAIL AND IM DATA when they consider its impact on social networking, referral / viral marketing, and monetization.

i'll tie all these threads together in my next post, after i finish packing up & moving.  ugh.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/188210/27219812

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Web Mail Services Market Share (Comscore, Oct 2007):

» Yahoo + Microsoft = Web Mail Dominance + SaaS Synergy + Finally Social Networking On A NewOrder from SmoothSpan Blog
Jeremy Zawodny writes that Yahoo + Microsoft = Web Mail Dominance based on this market share graphic: As you can see, and as Dave McClure wrote in his 500Hats blog, adding these two together results in total dominance for web mail.  True enough, but ... [Read More]

Comments

Hi David,

You are very correct. For web services outside of a mega-social network traditional email is still the bread and butter of communication. Widgets, embeds and everything else come second for most everyone.

At Dogster/Catster webmail providers account for most of the biggest inbound referrers (outside of search engines) and any viral campaign we do lives and dies by email forwarding. It's very rare for a widget or embed link to get something viral anymore.

I think it's also important to think about how many emails Facebook, MySpace, Flixster, etc. send out a day. Facebook has something like 20 settings regarding getting traditional emails that are all defaulted on when you start. Though Facebook's eco-system has it's own fabulous messaging system which is far far better than email, their growth relies heavily on traditional email.

I know how much we pay for email delivery at Dogster/Catster than most any other IT cost. Sure people can get free webmail accounts, but trying to send mail into those accounts and have it arrive in their Inbox has become a huge challenge.

And yes, I too am surprised to see Gmail's overall percentage. It's really grown quickly .

I think the low numbers for AOL stem from the fact that the majority of their mail users still use the non-web-based client to get to the mailbox... not sure gmail has actually surpassed them in number of users.

Mr. McClure, Could Google's accelerants be related to their "other" services like Analytics, AdSense, etc. which require/encourage a gmail account? Not certain AOL has that kind of lock-in for... anything.

Google just passed them by on their way up and AOLs way down.

PS- Congrats on the move. Hope all's well.

Which email service do you reckon will take over as the main player after the Microsoft Yahoo! Take over?

My belief is that they will make them interchangable.. one login for both and then create the same back end to run both.. ultimately 301 redirecting the one url into the other.. So it doesn't make much difference in tech... But the question remains?

Which Brand do you trust? Microsoft and Yahoo!

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

500 Tweets:

    follow me on Twitter

    500 Stats